This post about how to pursue a good life by maximizing happiness, and it’s based on the philosophy of John Stuart Mill. It the fourth post in a series on developing your own moral and ethical code.
Here are the first three posts in the series:
A Review of Aristotle and Kant
In this series, we have examined different ethical systems. We examined Aristotle’s view first. He argued that a good human life is one that pursues an inner state of human flourishing and well-being. The Greek word for this is Eudaimonia. And he believed people achieved this by cultivating the mean (or the perfect amount) of virtue in their life.
Kant, on the other hand, believed that we could live a free and humane life worthy of happiness by cultivating the good will. He argued that in order to do this, we must always act on principles that we could will everyone else to act on universally. So, we must avoid making ourselves the exception to the rule.
Introducing John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism
John Stuart Mill was an Englishman who lived in the 1800s. In his book Utilitarianism, he argues that the right action is the action that maximizes pleasure and minimizes pain.
This, according to Mill, is the Principle of Utility or the Greatest Happiness Principle.
Now of course, some people object to utilitarianism as a guiding moral principle because they believe that Mill is advocating pure hedonism. (Hedonists make the pursuit of pleasure–no matter the pleasure–the sole goal of their life.)
Mill explains, however, that his notion of pleasure encompasses the useful, the agreeable, and the ornamental (the beautiful).
So it is not based on a purely hedonistic calculus. Furthermore, he argues that quality of pleasure is just as important as quantity of pleasure. He suggests that we should pursue higher quality pleasures, which are the pleasures most befitting a human life.
Mill urges his readers to consider that human beings should not live an animal-like existence in their pursuit of pleasure. His famously argues that it is better to live like a “human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.”*
Of course the question at this point, regarding Mill’s moral philosophy, is “What is a higher quality pleasure?”
Mill believes it is pretty obvious. He argues that higher quality pleasures are the pleasures that folks choose who have experienced both higher and lower pleasures and have the capability of choosing the higher quality pleasures.
In addition, Mill makes it clear that a purely selfish pursuit of pleasure is not the kind of pleasure he has in mind. He argues that the greatest causes of human suffering are things like selfishness, a lack of education, poverty, and the pain that follows dramatic reverses in fortune. Mill suggest that we have the ability to relieve all these causes of suffering and that we have a moral obligation to do so.
Thus, for Mill, seeking higher quality pleasures has both a personal and social dimension. We are to maximize pleasure and minimize pain for everyone (or as many people as possible).
Try It Out Yourself
The exact nature of higher quality pleasures may not be as obvious as Mill thinks it is. However, if you are interested in using Mill’s moral philosophy as a guide for ethical decision-making, here are a few guidelines you can use to shape your conduct:
1. Act consistently in a way that maximizes both quality and quantity of pleasure and minimizes pain for the most people.
2. Make sure that the pleasure you maximize can be characterized as useful, agreeable, and beautiful.
2. Pursue a clear understanding of higher quality pleasures so that you can aim for such pleasures. Pay attention to people who care about higher quality pleasures and who have experienced a variety of pleasure. Determine what kind of pleasures they believe are higher quality pleasures and use their wisdom as a guide.
This is the fourth post in the series about developing your own moral code. In the first post, I gave you an overview of the different moral systems. Then I gave you an overview of Aristotle, Kant, and Mill’s moral and ethical systems. I did this so that you could think about which system or systems you believe are the best guide for moral and ethical conduct.
Remember that developing your own moral code is important to do because it allow you to act according to a consistent moral principle that aims at some type of higher good for yourself and others, rather than being ruled by mere passion or instinct or impulse or emotion.
All these personal influences can be helpful, but they are often contradictory and not necessarily focused on a higher good or on other people’s welfare.
Therefore, these personal influences need to be guided by some kind of rule or principle, and that is what ethics helps us do.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider sharing on social media.
*You can find this statement, along with the other ideas from Mill in this post, in his book Utilitarianism.
Published by shellypruittjohnson
My name is Shelly Johnson, and I am a writer and philosopher with a Ph.D. in philosophy. One of my primary personal and philosophical interests is how we can learn to love ourselves and each other better in order to cultivate personal and political resilience. I teach ethics and a variety of other courses at a local college. I am the author of the blog Love is Stronger. I am also the author of three logic and critical thinking books for high school and middle school: _Argument Builder_, _Discovery of Deduction_ (co-author), and _Everyday Debate_, published by Classical Academic Press. You can reach me at email@example.com.
View all posts by shellypruittjohnson
5 thoughts on “How to Pursue a Good Life by Maximizing Happiness”
In our highly-charged political climate, this makes for some thoughtful reading. I try to imagine how each candidate would think about a moral code.
This is such a good point, N. Yes, I think you are right that when we stop and thinking about what the philosophers would think about our political morality, it can be a really eye-opening exercise. I think utilitarianism as a moral philosophy has some serious flaws, but I really appreciate Mill’s emphasis on the social dimension of morality. Thanks, as always, for reading and for your kind comments. You’re a gem.